CLICK HERE FOR FULL TEXT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ERNEST LARRY ADAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
   No. 16-2786
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.
No. 2:09-cr-20224-5—Gerald E. Rosen, District Judge.
Decided and Filed: October 11, 2017
Before: MOORE, WHITE, and DONALD, Circuit Judges.


_________________________
OPINION
_________________________

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge. Ernest Adams is a seventy-one-year-old opiate addict with an extensive criminal history; most of his convictions stem from his substance-abuse problems. While on supervised release, Adams tested positive for opiates on numerous occasions and subsequently pleaded guilty to violating a condition of his supervised release. The district court then revoked his supervised release and imposed a below-Guidelines sentence of eighteen months’ imprisonment. On appeal, Adams argues that the district court abused its discretion by imposing a procedurally and substantively unreasonable sentence. We hold that the district court’s sentencing decision was procedurally unreasonable because the court violated Adams’s due-process right when it based his sentence upon unreliable information about rehabilitation. We further hold that the sentence was substantively unreasonable because the district court violated Tapia v. United States, 564 U.S. 319 (2011), when it considered rehabilitation as a factor when calculating the length of the period of incarceration. We therefore VACATE the defendant’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing.